Do apparel brands, despite accusations of human rights violations by the BDS movement, support Israel amid the conflict with Palestine? Despite growing consumer activism and potential economic repercussions, these companies prioritize profits over taking a stand against injustice. Does their support for Israel suggest that profits outweigh human rights concerns?
Zara
Zara’s marketing campaign caused a lot of anger by showing dead bodies wrapped in plastic and a war-like atmosphere. Many people thought it made fun of the tragic events in Gaza.
Also, the head of Zara’s franchisee in Israel, Trimera, was caught with a person who was found guilty of being a terrorist during the election season. Even though there was so much controversy, Zara didn’t take any action to distance itself from these controversial people and continued with the campaign.
Link Proof: https://www.thenationalnews.com/lifestyle/fashion-beauty/2023/12/10/zara-campaign-boycott-gaza-palestine/
Puma
Puma’s backing of the Israel Football Association (IFA) has been called into question as the teams operate on illegally occupied Palestinian land. Many believe that by financially supporting these organizations, Puma is playing a part in maintaining the Israeli occupation. This has resulted in criticism of the company’s sponsorship.
Link Proof: https://thisispuma.com/
Marks and Spencer (M&S)
For more than 100 years, Marks and Spencer has played a vital role in connecting Israel and the UK due to their support for Zionism. Despite claiming to remain neutral on politics, their deep-rooted association with the movement brings up worries about their position on the Israeli-Palestinian issue.
Link Proof: https://www.ihrc.org.uk/briefing-a-brief-chronology-of-the-marks-spencer-israel-relationship/
Fox
Due to its association with Israel’s policies or interests, the Fox brand is at risk of being boycotted by consumers who perceive it as a solely Israeli brand.
Link Proof: http://bit.ly/493nCv6
Castro
Castro, as an Israeli brand, is at risk of being boycotted due to its alleged backing of Israeli actions in Palestinian territories. This can have negative impacts on its reputation and sales.
Link Proof: https://bit.ly/3w7Xrox
American Apparel
The Jewish brand, American Apparel, is facing boycott demands because it is believed to support Israel’s policies and interests. This negative perception is leading people to avoid the brand.
Link Proof: https://rb.gy/30n1bt
Levi Strauss & Co
The brand Levi Strauss & Co, which is also run by Jewish people, faces a boycott due to their perceived backing of Israeli policies and actions in Palestinian territories. This has caused disapproval and rejection towards the brand.
Link Proof: https://boycottlist.me/
Kenneth Cole
The brand known as Kenneth Cole, which is thought to be exclusively Jewish, is receiving boycott requests because people believe it supports Israel’s actions and interests. This negative attention is affecting the brand’s reputation.
Link Proof: https://artofpalestine-blog.tumblr.com/post/93450017607/boycott-israel-cheat-sheet-cosmetics-health-and
Chanel
Questions have been raised about Chanel’s ethical stance due to the Wertheimer family, who privately own the company and are known for supporting Israel, remaining silent on Gaza’s situation. While they have denounced attacks on Israel, their donations to Israel in Chanel’s name are concerning.
Link Proof: https://www.universityoffashion.com/blog/#:~:text=Chanel%20was%20donating%20%244%20million
Delta Galil Industries
Delta Galil Industries, being based in Israel, may face boycott due to the perceived backing of Israeli policies and actions in Palestinian territories. This could negatively impact the company’s operations.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israel-2012.php
Timberland
Jeffrey Swartz, President and CEO of Timberland and an outspoken Zionist, is receiving backlash as calls for boycott grow. Swartz showed support for Israel by proposing to send 100 IDF soldiers as ambassadors to the US during a recent visit. Despite Timberland being a publicly traded company, Swartz’s family holds a significant stake, giving them control over decisions.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israel-2012.php
RIVER ISLAND Clothing
There are calls to boycott RIVER ISLAND Clothing because of their supposed support for the Zionist State. The organization is being accused of sending British money to the occupied territories, which is said to be helping the Zionists and causing harm to the Palestinians. This has made people upset and they are urging others to not support the company.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israel-2012.php
Tefron
Calls for a boycott of Tefron are growing because people see the brand as being too supportive of Israel’s policies and interests.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israel-2012.php
Bagir
Bagir, known for its strong support of Israel, is now being called to boycott for supposedly supporting the country’s actions and policies, causing a negative impact on its reputation.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israel-2012.php
THE LIMITED
THE LIMITED, which is believed to heavily support Israel, is facing boycott requests because of its association with Israeli policies and interests, causing concern among many people.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-limited.html
Express
Due to its strong support for Israel, Express has been targeted for a boycott as it is believed to endorse Israel’s policies and actions, which are unpopular.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-limited.html
Lerner New York
Lerner New York, accused of showing strong support for Israel, is now being called for boycott because people think it’s on the same page as Israel’s policies and interests.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-limited.html
RIVER ISLAND Clothing
Boycott calls are being made against RIVER ISLAND Clothing, as they have been accused of supporting the Zionist State by allegedly using British capital to benefit the Zionists in the occupied territories, causing harm to the Palestinians.
Link Proof: http://www.inminds.com/boycott-israel-2012.php
Adidas
The boycott of Adidas is happening because they are using Delta Galil, an Israeli manufacturer, to make their underwear line. People are worried that this means Adidas is indirectly supporting Israel.
Link Proof: https://adidasunderwear.com/pages/adidas-underwear-partnership/
American Eagle
The Israeli flag on American Eagle’s billboard in Times Square has caused controversy, leading to calls for a boycott. Many see it as supporting the apartheid state of Israel, leading to a negative reception from the public.
Bally
Boycotts against Bally are being demanded because of the Reimann family’s unwavering support for Zionism and the Zionist state, which is apparent through their investments and donations facilitated by the Alfred Landecker Foundation. This has led to negative public opinion towards the brand.
Link Proof: https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/article/the-story-of-the-alfred-landecker-foundation
Bulgari / Bvlgari
Many people are boycotting Bulgari/Bvlgari because its parent company’s owner, Bernard Arnault, has invested millions in Israeli companies. This raises concerns about indirectly supporting Israel’s interests.
Celine
Celine is under pressure to face a boycott because its parent company’s owner, Bernard Arnault of LVMH, has invested heavily in Israeli businesses, leading to accusations of being aligned with Israel’s agenda. This has sparked a negative response from the public.
Coty
Coty is facing boycott requests as the Reimann family, who are committed Zionists, have control over the company. The family supports the Zionist state by investing and donating funds through their Alfred Landecker Foundation.
Link Proof: https://www.alfredlandecker.org/en/article/the-story-of-the-alfred-landecker-foundation
Dior
Dior is at risk of a boycott due to its parent company LVMH’s owner, Bernard Arnault, investing heavily in Israeli companies. This has sparked worry about indirectly supporting Israel’s agenda.
DKNY
Many people are choosing not to support DKNY because LVMH, led by Bernard Arnault, invests a lot of money in Israeli companies, which gives the impression that they support Israel’s policies and interests.
Fendi
Boycotts against Fendi are gaining momentum because Bernard Arnault, owner of its parent company LVMH, is investing large sums in Israeli companies. This is causing concern that Fendi may indirectly support Israel’s interests.
Fenty Beauty by Rihanna
The demand to boycott Fenty Beauty by Rihanna is increasing because the owner of its parent company, Bernard Arnault of LVMH, is investing a lot of money in Israeli companies. This is causing worries about indirectly supporting Israel’s interests, and it is making people feel negatively towards the brand.
Givenchy
Boycott demands against Givenchy have emerged due to the heavy investments made by LVMH’s owner, Bernard Arnault, in Israeli companies. This has resulted in a perception of alignment with Israel’s policies and interests, causing dissatisfaction among some individuals.
Kenzo
The boycott against Kenzo is happening because its owner, Bernard Arnault of LVMH, invests heavily in Israeli companies. This has raised concerns about indirect support for Israel’s interests, making people turn away from the brand.
Loewe
Boycott demands are being directed at Loewe due to the investments of its parent company’s owner, Bernard Arnault of LVMH, in Israeli businesses. This has raised concerns about possible indirect support for Israel’s interests.
Maison Francis Kurkdjian
The ownership of Maison Francis Kurkdjian by Bernard Arnault, a big investor in Israeli companies, has led to a boycott of the brand as it is seen to align with Israel’s policies and interests. This has negatively impacted the brand’s reputation.
Marc Jacobs
Boycott requests target Marc Jacobs due to the investment of LVMH’s Bernard Arnault in Israeli firms, which generates worry about backing Israel’s objectives indirectly.
Next
Boycott demands loom over Next plc due to the Wolfson family’s association with perceived Zionist interests through their charitable contributions towards science and culture initiatives in Israel.
Link Proof: https://www.wfct.org/
Skechers
The boycott of Skechers is gaining momentum due to the fact that their president, Michael S Greenberg, has expressed support for Israel on social media. This has led to concerns about the company’s stance towards Israel’s policies and interests.
Link Proof: https://www.instagram.com/p/CzMMTQgLu9Q/
Skims
Skims is facing boycott demands due to Kim Kardashian, the owner, sharing messages to her Jewish friends without publicly condemning Israel’s actions. This has raised concerns about the brand’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Link Proof: https://www.instagram.com/p/CyRnmHgvhgv/
STELLA by Stella McCartney
People are calling for a boycott of STELLA by Stella McCartney because it is owned by Bernard Arnault of LVMH. Arnault invests a lot of money in Israeli companies, which makes people worried that buying STELLA could indirectly support Israel.
Ted Baker
Customers are calling for a boycott of Ted Baker because of their partnership with Delta Galil, an Israeli company, for men’s underwear, loungewear, and thermal wear. This has raised concerns about Ted Baker’s relationship with Israeli interests.
Tiffany & Co.
People are calling for a boycott of Tiffany & Co. because its parent company, LVMH’s Bernard Arnault, has been investing a lot in Israeli companies. This is making people worried that they might be indirectly supporting Israel’s interests.
Tory Burch
Tory Burch is being asked to be boycotted due to their large donations to Israel, which has led to doubts about their connection to Israeli policies and priorities. This has not been received well by many people.
Victoria’s Secret
Calls for boycott of Victoria’s Secret are increasing due to its parent company, L Brands, owned by Les Wexner, who has been a strong supporter of Israel and has had business relations with Jeffrey Epstein, causing worry about the company’s loyalty to Israeli causes.
Link Proof: https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-relationship-between-epstein-and-jewish-philanthropist-wexner-explained/
La Senza
People are urging others to boycott La Senza, which is a brand owned by L Brands, the parent company of Victoria’s Secret. Les Wexner, the owner of L Brands, has been supportive of Israel and had business connections with Jeffrey Epstein. This has caused worries that the company is not aligned with people’s interests.
Link Proof: https://www.timesofisrael.com/the-relationship-between-epstein-and-jewish-philanthropist-wexner-explained/
Upon investigation, it’s clear that apparel brands prioritize money over ethics, endorsing oppressive regimes despite claiming neutrality. Their financial support of injustice contradicts calls for ethical business practices.
Consumers face a dilemma: support brands sustaining oppression or demand change. The fashion industry’s profit-first approach, disregarding Palestinian lives and rights, is unacceptable. As advocates for peace, we must boycott these brands.
